Commercial Payer Downcoding Practices — What Coders Should Know

Recent industry reports have drawn attention to Cigna and Humana’s “downcoding” practices, raising critical questions about payer transparency, compliance, and fair reimbursement. For coders and auditors, understanding the mechanics of these trends is essential to safeguarding revenue integrity.

What is Downcoding?

Downcoding occurs when a payer automatically reduces the level of service billed — for example, adjusting a claim from a Level 4 (99214) to a Level 3 (99213) — without proper clinical review. This practice can lead to significant underpayment, even when documentation supports the higher level of care.

Why It Matters

Recently, both Cigna and Humana have faced scrutiny, including legal implications, for automated algorithms that review claims and adjust levels based on pre-set parameters rather than individualized chart review. This not only impacts reimbursement but also undermines provider trust.

What You Can Do

To protect your organization from future downcoding practices:

• Audit Denials: Identify patterns in downcoding by payer and track adjustment trends.
• Appeal Strategically: Reference medical necessity, time-based documentation, and E/M guideline criteria to justify higher service levels.
• Educate Providers: Reinforce the importance of clear MDM (Medical Decision-Making) documentation — especially when complexity is justified.

Downcoding isn’t just a payer issue — it’s a revenue integrity issue. By staying vigilant and documenting thoroughly, healthcare organizations can challenge unjustified adjustments and preserve the reimbursement they’ve rightfully earned.

At Kaio Coding Solutions™, we help practices transform denials into opportunities for compliance and recovery — bringing light to even the most complex payer challenges.

‍